Click Here For
.."If Relative motion of the field slows time (as in General Relativity) perhaps to move the field near us at near light speed to make a time machine, a sort of wind tunnel of the field" might improve our awareness of relativity for many types of machines. Even if in relative motion, electrical bodies moving at near c will make the field points move at c and thus the dilation.Without having to go near the speed of light with a high speed ship and higher cost relativity and the slowing of time might be achieved for more massive bodies than quanta....This may help us understand motifs of special relativity like the Fitzgerald Contraction which has never been observed experimentally..My belief is Einstein was wrong when he said that the high speed observer with experiments wouldn't notice anything unusual in the elevator near the speed of light, there may be no observer due to the particles all lining up with ionization at high energy with high energy fields.
Einstein considered a large HG Wells type time machine and thought it possible, yet he believed if so you couldn't time travel with the machine to before the machine was built. As I say on the link below, I agree with Einstein that this seems possible, just extremely improbable since the past doesn't exist now, and would have to be "rebuilt" atom by atom, which would not only be expensive, it would essentially "erase" our own world of the 21st century, and a small time machine like Wells considered is unfeasable.
As I say on my page about time, if no other method of finding the time of machines like Einstein considered, the best method may be by computer simulations based on better information. Three methods might be by MRI to mine old neurons, by mining ancient light or by the record of the quantum events.
MINING OLD NEURONS
It's been known by research since the 1920's that each neuron contains all the memory of the entire brain. I believe we might use MRI or other sensors to find the information in synapses of more ancient neurons, and thus make the next best thing to a real time machine by computer simulations based on reliable records. Recently old dinosaur fossils have been found to have soft tissue preserved in 4 out of 5 museum relics from the early 1900's, and a dinosaur mummy has been found in the W. US. CLICK HERE for my Site about MRI, old neurons and History or see the link at the end of this post.
USING THE HISTORY OF ENTANGLEMENT
If there were an electron telescope and electrons weren't scattered by the fields before they reach us we could see by much higher resolution. I believe the Higgs' particle may be the low energy particle Einstein believed in to get around the Uncertainty Principle. If so the low energy version of the Higgs' believed to exist at the lowest energy state might be out of the Uncertainty loop and so may not have smaller size with more mass, just like the masses around us in room temperature, room size physics. This might enable us to mine the light we already have for more information. This would also in essence be a sort of Higgs' microscope.
I was looking for a way to find the code of events nearby in hopes of changing it to then change and cloak the distant light. This might help explain the lack of all the distant systems being not lit up by the lights of the advanced civilizations these days if as most believe they seem probable. It might be common in the history or advanced history of most civilizations to find this method of removing the light they radiate, including a way to collapse long wavelength light by using the recent method of the quantum mechanics of even large size masses that's been found.
Recent experiments show that Einstein was partially right about Schrodinger's cat. I believe this might be by way of the Higgs' interacting externally to change the "constellation" of each quanta.
If the Higgs' are a sort of constellation of mass around a quanta like an electron, this might be how the EPR can find the distant entangled photon by a sort of resonation of this constellation. If you take two fans and spin one the other will spin up to it's speed with resonance. Yet if other fans weren't with the same constellation, they wouldn't resonate the same, this may be how the EPR finds just the second photon.
As I thought about how to find the photon near to collapse and change the distant photon, I imagined somehow using a "Higgs' ray" to "highlight" the near photons leftover from the EPR event that unified them with the distant photon to find it and then collapse its wave function. And I realized there would need to be some sort of timer of EPR events sort of like the molecular clock in biology to find the nearby photons, if this was possible. The constant rain of muons would emit free Higgs' or as I say on my videos they may be the same as gravitons. One problem as Einstein realized was why old electrons have the same mass as new in the Earth's gravity, and gravity is lower energy than the EPR, so gravity is more external to the electron, and flows around the outside without shielding. For the entanglements which most particles around us have a history, I believe the gravitons might mark the time somewhat based on events like earthquakes, solar flares, or cosmic rays to establish the exact time the events were "recorded" by the entanglement. Since the events all around us are constantly being recorded by being set by the entanglements there may be vast amounts of information about history embedded in the mass of the Earth stored each day in history, or the electrons might even have more ancient information left over.
The Higgs' ray may be by way of the inertial field which seems to have been found by the LIGO observatory as I say here. It may be at the speed of light and so near the energy of the Higgs' field, and so using if it's at nearer energy than gravity, quanta in rings might be used to make a tube like a laser except for the Higgs' used where light in the laser may enable us to make a monochromatic Higgs' laser in hopes of finding the data in the quanta around us if possible.
MINING ANCIENT LIGHT
As I say too on the link above, other methods of finding the ancient information, e.g. to boost accuracy of the neuron mined information it's possible we might mine some light emitted each day in history. Light from a distant regular source may interact based on two of Einstein's ideas, Special Relativity, and change of the light by interacting at higher energy. Carl Sagan says in Cosmos, there's no bringing back the light, even so by light interacting with the distant light as Einstein also considered, a certain amount of the record may be refound. This method wouldn't seem to have as much value to historians and other like paleontologists, even so neurons like DNA don't last forever, and for some value and for another line of evidence (like e.g forensics) I believe the record in the light may have some value.
You may say the record in light is too remote, but as I say on my site about time (link above) and consideration or my improvement of Einstein's ideas, telescopes of vast resolution may be built even in the near future. Two types of telescopes are giant inflatable lenses, and a sweeping ray telescope. As I say Einstein also believed light is unchanged from source to absorption so the speed of light is constant in Special Relativity. More distant light would be "eroded" more by Einstein's second idea while nearer light would have more of the information, as with fossils of more prosaic type by way of his first idea. Higher energy light like x rays will certainly bounce off each other while low energy light will pass through, even so in between there may be enough interaction to extract information of the light from a distant regular source combined with the interaction of the historic light with the light from the source. Many of these old photons will make it through to the interaction zone and be perhaps readable.
With higher radius the same number of light photons are there, they're just changed more in the volume, this is why there has been no limit to telescopes and this may be a way to find even the distant record in the light, plus perhaps even the light of cities of distant advanced civilizations. It's known we would need a telescope 1 million times the Hubble that would see the distant lights of advanced civilizations, and sweeping ray lens or a giant cheap inflatable lens would be viable here..
Please Redirect Here For More About Time
posted by starship orion | 2:26 PM
